Charles Hoskinson Fires Back at Cardano Critics: ‘We’re Actually Winning’

• Cardano founder Charles Hoskinson defends the blockchain’s achievements against critics.
• Hoskinson emphasizes Cardano’s extensive research, development, and strong community.
• He highlights the Chang Hard Fork as a major initiative to solve blockchain scalability issues.

In a recent video podcast, Cardano founder Charles Hoskinson defended the blockchain’s progress and ambitious goals against mounting criticism. He emphasized Cardano’s extensive research, development efforts, and growing community as evidence of its leading position in the crypto space.

While Cardano has reportedly achieved “all the things that it sought out to do,” many people paradoxically argue that the project has achieved nothing. Hoskinson stated that numerous critics dismiss Cardano’s achievements as lies or “techno bubbles.” Emphasizing that increased criticism often correlates with progress, he added, “We’re actually winning.” Further, he stated:

“The reality is there is no project in our industry that has done more science, written more code, and ultimately has a bigger impact on the overall thinking of how cryptocurrencies ought to be built. We, by no means, are perfect and there’s a lot of things we would do over again very differently as an ecosystem at a project.”

Addressing Cardano’s notable Chang hard fork , Hoskinson questioned the critics’ claims of Cardano’s failure to achieve anything. Reportedly, the Chang Hard Fork represents the biggest initiative to solve the blockchain trilemma of security, decentralization, and scalability.

Moreover, responding to the public’s negative comments about Cardano, Hoskinson asserted that Cardano is the strongest blockchain. He added:

“If you look at the fundamentals, at the end of the day, we are the strongest. Because, we have the strongest community. We have the best depth of research. And ultimately, we have the best engineers and the best builders.”

In related news, Hoskinson shared insights on the “profound” implications of artificial intelligence censorship. He pointed out that AI should be decentralized and open-sourced, freeing it from the control of industry giants.